<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Increase the speed of Linux Software RAID reconstruction</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/</link> <description>The Journal Of A Linux Sysadmin</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Chas</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181659</link> <dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:45:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181659</guid> <description>@phantomd  This is why I ditched the 1.5Gbps 4-port PCI card with the crappy bios.I looked at my options and found that a motherboard with 6 SATA ports @ 3Gbps integrated was less expensive then most good 4 port cards.If only I&#039;d known about using chunk sizes of 128kb or even 256kb to speed things even more. As it stands with 32kb chunks, I get about 16 to 20Mbytes/sec over Gbit Ethernet. I may swap the CPU with another machine to an Athlon64 x2 @ 2.5Ghz (65W).Good luck</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@phantomd  This is why I ditched the 1.5Gbps 4-port PCI card with the crappy bios.</p><p> I looked at my options and found that a motherboard with 6 SATA ports @ 3Gbps integrated was less expensive then most good 4 port cards.</p><p>If only I&#8217;d known about using chunk sizes of 128kb or even 256kb to speed things even more. As it stands with 32kb chunks, I get about 16 to 20Mbytes/sec over Gbit Ethernet. I may swap the CPU with another machine to an Athlon64 x2 @ 2.5Ghz (65W).</p><p>Good luck</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: phantomd</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181547</link> <dc:creator>phantomd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:51:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181547</guid> <description>Hi
First of all thank you for this nice explanation. I am Running Fedora 10 with the Kernel 2.6.27.41-170.2.117.fc10.x86_64 my system is a core2duo 2.66Ghz, 4GB Memory, and i have a Software Raid 5 with 7x1TB running. I change the settings like described here but my reshape speed is like this :[==&gt;..................]  reshape = 11.2% (108814776/969924224) finish=1065.4min speed=13467K/secI can&#039;t get higher speed, and during the reshape if i have a look at top my system is 70% idleI think it really depends which disk u have, which controllers are used and which kernel and distri are in use. Grrr waiting and watch ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br
/> First of all thank you for this nice explanation. I am Running Fedora 10 with the Kernel 2.6.27.41-170.2.117.fc10.x86_64 my system is a core2duo 2.66Ghz, 4GB Memory, and i have a Software Raid 5 with 7&#215;1TB running. I change the settings like described here but my reshape speed is like this :</p><p>[==&gt;..................]  reshape = 11.2% (108814776/969924224) finish=1065.4min speed=13467K/sec</p><p>I can&#8217;t get higher speed, and during the reshape if i have a look at top my system is 70% idle</p><p>I think it really depends which disk u have, which controllers are used and which kernel and distri are in use. Grrr waiting and watch <img
src='http://www.ducea.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chas</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181510</link> <dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:08:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181510</guid> <description>con&#039;t -- It turned out I&#039;d rather just have it work, it was less expensive to get an ASROCK A780LM motherboard from Newegg, than to buy a better controller card ($62.55 USD shipped).  it has 6 SATA II ports, and built in Gbit Ethernet. Now I just need to figure out why its only getting 100/Mbit link speeds. Its a great board for a file server. I just transplanted the CPU/RAM form the old one.PCLinuxOS 2009.2 running on:
AMD Sempron 1150LE (2ghz 45W)
ASROCK A780LM integrated everything board (one IDE, 6 SATA II ports)
2GB Corsair DDR2 5300 RAM
5 WDC green 1TB SATA drives in software raid5
1 laptop 120GB SATA boot driveThe RAID transfer rate over the network is now about 9.94 Mbytes/sec, pretty close to the max for 100Mbit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>con&#8217;t &#8212; It turned out I&#8217;d rather just have it work, it was less expensive to get an ASROCK A780LM motherboard from Newegg, than to buy a better controller card ($62.55 USD shipped).  it has 6 SATA II ports, and built in Gbit Ethernet. Now I just need to figure out why its only getting 100/Mbit link speeds. Its a great board for a file server. I just transplanted the CPU/RAM form the old one.</p><p>PCLinuxOS 2009.2 running on:<br
/> AMD Sempron 1150LE (2ghz 45W)<br
/> ASROCK A780LM integrated everything board (one IDE, 6 SATA II ports)<br
/> 2GB Corsair DDR2 5300 RAM<br
/> 5 WDC green 1TB SATA drives in software raid5<br
/> 1 laptop 120GB SATA boot drive</p><p>The RAID transfer rate over the network is now about 9.94 Mbytes/sec, pretty close to the max for 100Mbit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chas</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181492</link> <dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 06:35:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181492</guid> <description>Well I think the problem is the sil3114, after some Googleing, I found that it has issues with drives of 1TB +It is possible that a newer firmware on the card may help .. I have 2 cards and one I used a year or so back with some 320GB drives in SATA controller mode and it worked great, THAT card hangs after displaying the model of the first drive .. the other one seems to have been assembled with a flash chip that is not supported by the mfg&#039;s flash utility (?!) and so it is in raid mode, however Linux still detected the drives individually (bypassing the cards firmware?!) using hdparm showed no DMA flag at all, so it is probably using PIO mode.I will try to re-flash the first card and see if things work any better, I might find a flash chip on ebay and do a bit-o field engineering :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think the problem is the sil3114, after some Googleing, I found that it has issues with drives of 1TB +</p><p>It is possible that a newer firmware on the card may help .. I have 2 cards and one I used a year or so back with some 320GB drives in SATA controller mode and it worked great, THAT card hangs after displaying the model of the first drive .. the other one seems to have been assembled with a flash chip that is not supported by the mfg&#8217;s flash utility (?!) and so it is in raid mode, however Linux still detected the drives individually (bypassing the cards firmware?!) using hdparm showed no DMA flag at all, so it is probably using PIO mode.</p><p>I will try to re-flash the first card and see if things work any better, I might find a flash chip on ebay and do a bit-o field engineering <img
src='http://www.ducea.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chas</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181484</link> <dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:10:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181484</guid> <description>I haven&#039;t checked that, but it is difficult to imagine a modern hard drive anything like that slow, I&#039;ll check and post more info.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t checked that, but it is difficult to imagine a modern hard drive anything like that slow, I&#8217;ll check and post more info.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: - Marius -</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181482</link> <dc:creator>- Marius -</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:38:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181482</guid> <description>@Chas: is the speed of the individual drives faster than what you get on the raid partition? I would say that the speed penalty of this comes from the speed of the actual drives as mdadm is very fast normally.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chas: is the speed of the individual drives faster than what you get on the raid partition? I would say that the speed penalty of this comes from the speed of the actual drives as mdadm is very fast normally.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chas</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181478</link> <dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181478</guid> <description>My problem is that writing or reading files to the array is extremely slow, less than 1MiB/sec
I have 5 x 1TB drives on SATA 1.5gbps ports using MDADM on a system with 1gb RAM, and a 2ghz single core AMD cpu.Any help would be appreciated.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem is that writing or reading files to the array is extremely slow, less than 1MiB/sec<br
/> I have 5 x 1TB drives on SATA 1.5gbps ports using MDADM on a system with 1gb RAM, and a 2ghz single core AMD cpu.</p><p>Any help would be appreciated.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jay</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-181106</link> <dc:creator>jay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-181106</guid> <description>any ideas how to do this on a hardware or dm raid?
i&#039;ve an 4gb reconfiguring to 6.8 and i&#039;ve about 14 days remaining</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any ideas how to do this on a hardware or dm raid?<br
/> i&#8217;ve an 4gb reconfiguring to 6.8 and i&#8217;ve about 14 days remaining</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ole-Magnus</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-179800</link> <dc:creator>Ole-Magnus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:35:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-179800</guid> <description>Thank you! I was growing a full 3TB raid up to 7.5TB (6x1.5TB raid5) and it was supposed to take 15 _days_. With this tweak I&#039;m down to ~32hours! YAY!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I was growing a full 3TB raid up to 7.5TB (6&#215;1.5TB raid5) and it was supposed to take 15 _days_. With this tweak I&#8217;m down to ~32hours! YAY!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andryan&#8217;s Random Notes &#187; Painfully Slow CentOS System</title><link>http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/comment-page-1/#comment-179005</link> <dc:creator>Andryan&#8217;s Random Notes &#187; Painfully Slow CentOS System</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:56:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ducea.com/2006/06/25/increase-the-speed-of-linux-software-raid-reconstruction/#comment-179005</guid> <description>[...] the sync speed is only around 1000KB/s. I tried looking for solutions on Google and found this and this. The solution I got didn&#8217;t help increase the sync speed, nor the slow response I was getting [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the sync speed is only around 1000KB/s. I tried looking for solutions on Google and found this and this. The solution I got didn&#8217;t help increase the sync speed, nor the slow response I was getting [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/24 queries in 0.017 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.ducea.com @ 2010-03-19 19:25:30 -->